BY Nasrul Azwar
Become
a member of the House of Representatives was exciting. At least, partially
funded with state money to live. Not only council member who received a
blessing, family and children can also be sprayed. Because there are also some
allowances allocated to children and a wife/husband. Morally, other family-out
wife/husband and children, social status come up as well. Thus, the domino
effect of a successful council seats, are quite large.
Besides
given the relatively large salaries, each council member was also given a
facility such as cars, houses, and others as. Everything is still to use money
from the revenue budget coffers shopping area/country. If they carry out their
duties, for example, discuss the budget, or bill, Ranperda, and other types of
meetings, or make special committee, kunker, comparative studies, they also are
tired of money/pocket from there, although they had paid millions of dollars.
For
issues related to the amount of allowances and facilities received by board
members in central and local government, the recent protests is the rent
amounting to Rp13 million per month for members of Parliament. And that was
also enough to make people furious Bangka Belitung is a discussion of the 2008
budget plan in a hotel in the City Pangkalpinang. Harsh criticism of society
discourage this plan.
But,
make Bangka Regency Parliament, who can loan a new bike and a car, just as
blase blase-heard criticism of society. Now each council member had to use
loans from the Government of the motor in the form of Bangka Regency vario
motor types. For members of this council, no matter whether the motor is used
or not: the important accept it first.
Being
a member of the board and sat on the loveseat with her room-ac with fragrant
fragrant flowers, and all needs are provided by the state, it becomes the ideal
many people. This means that there is life there is quite promising.
At
least, after sitting there, the social status would be lifted, the degree will
go up. In the midst of the family, the board considered a prestigious position.
Authoritative. And is considered to know all the problems that occur in
society. Anyway, a member of the board, things like the rose.
To
go there, there are many hurdles as well, although many also came to chair the
board was so easy. Smooth-smooth course. Because the process of selecting board
members is now different from the previously-although different but the
substance has not changed, according to a directly elected to be nominated, of
course, "sell" programs to the community became a major.
Formerly,
when the legislative elections, candidates for council member is trying to
bring himself into masyakakat, giving promise to solve the problems of society,
and sometimes want to ensure menggratiskan school fees. Similarly about how
they take people's hearts. They seduce and sedate the public with promises. But
the goal is to select me.
To
make the approach and gentle persuasion was, of course, require substantial
funding. Because every gathering with the community, at least rice wrap sweater
and candidates concerned must be provided. The amount of funds spent, depending
on which candidates for the board: if the candidate for the province, of the
cost will be different from the candidates for city/counties. But clearly, all
candidates determined to reach into his pocket for this and that expense
Now,
those who have sat as a board member for the not-lucky, just fight on the
upcoming elections, now are enjoying delicious on the board.
For
people who have chosen a candidate in the election last time, and chance
"successful", while now living witnessed how the
"deception" and "gentle persuasion" was proved only
sweetener used alone. Just bullshit. Just crap. Master voice the people's voice
(not God), to find justification. Gentlemen residing in that stately building's
status as people's representatives confirmed that he was there because the
people's voice, but now prefers her voice, her own.
From
it all, the election twice after the reform, namely 1999 and 2004, is
impressive not give anything for the people. In fact, an impressive community
sucks. Since the alleged corruption of the congregation who do nearly all the
board members in Indonesia up efforts to increase their allowances and
salaries, all the time so the public spotlight, and in fact some say board
members do not have feelings and attitudes menzalimi public trust.
Some
political observers assess the social, especially in the performance of the
board at the local level are concerned. Issues of experience, educational
background, and the weak ability to argue (this is also related to the low
level of experience of the organization), unresponsive, often too late to act,
making them as is with the executive. Government looks far ahead. Thus the
difference is very evident when discussing the budget and also the recipient of
government accountability reports. Legislative like "dikadalin" executive.
Some
time ago, and Surrounding Pambangunan Market Traders (P4S) to communicate their
aspirations Pangkalpinang City DPRD. These complaints related to the
elimination of legislative committee recommended asset Pangkalpinang. But what
can I say, in the office of representative of the people that none of the
existing board members. All council members went to Jakarta with a variety of
reasons. Finally, traders joined in P4S disappointed.
It
has become a phenomenon in which new areas are divided or developed, including
of course, Bangka Belitung Islands Province. Long experience in the executive
bureaucracy and their mastery of data is also the technical problem,
"forcing" the legislature accepted the executive report. Legislative
oversight of executive function during this limited time receive reports held
meetings, hearings, and formal hearings. And rarely legislative initiative to
the field to check the truth of an agency report.
Case
of the motor and car rental agencies to Parliament by the Government of Bangka
Regency Bangka, for example, is a case which is quite unique and odd numbered.
Where unique and strange? The first question which the institution's first
initiative was proposed vehicle purchase. Second, the type of motor vehicle
loaned executive to the legislature did not consider the operational utility
and effectiveness.
Party
legislature (DPRD Bangka), said the purchase of motorcycles for the initiative
came from local government councils of Bangka. Parliament was never submitted a
budget for such things. In fact, party secretary of the board acknowledged was
never invited and involved in the buying process sema once the bike. Meanwhile,
the executive (Bangka regency) argued, all the existing budget in the budget
proposal comes from the respective agencies, including the Parliament of
Bangka. However, there are also among the board members are admitted in Bangka,
Bangka cheated and that Parliament was impressed "duped" the
executive.
So
this land shall be managed and regulated by each other "to eat". Consuming
legislative executive, and vice versa. While the people victims of
"cannibalism" is. *
No comments:
Post a Comment